Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 1 - 20 of 934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 7:43 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to dismiss because the asserted claims of defendant's parking enforcement patents encompassed unpatentable subject matter and found that the claims were directed toward an abstract idea. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:50 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in New Jersey granted a technology staffing company’s motion to set aside a DOL Administrative Review Board determination that the company willfully failed to comply with H-1B notice-posting requirements at required work sites (CAMO Technologies, Inc v Solis, October 18, 2013, Martini, W). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Section 1237 was amended a final time through the Ronald W. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One type is granting protection to matter that hasn’t earned protection—doesn’t actually function as a mark; aren’t used in a TM way. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:42 am by Tobin Admin
” The insurance company argued it didn’t send the settlement check because the plaintiff failed to provide an executed W-9 form. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Chancery Court said that, as a matter of law, it does not matter if the board truly thought that losing the CEO would be more harmful to shareholder value than acceding to his compensation desires. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
Thompson said recently that the committee is busy sorting through “so much information” that “there might not be a need for an immediate hearing” any time soon: “[W]e’re getting a lot of stuff that we didn’t know about. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Why are some companies more nimble w/privacy issues than others? [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Beth Graham
Following a hearing on the matter, the Western District of Texas granted the company’s motion in part. [read post]