Search for: "W. et al v. Hardy" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of C.K., J.K., M.K., S.K., & L.K., Anthony McNary, et al v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Ian Ayres et al.Petitioner's reply CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am by David Kopel
She writes that: The amicus brief by Kopel et al. paints a picture of widespread gun carrying incongruous with this well-established history. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]