Search for: "WALKER v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 301 - 320
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Yesterday the US District Court for the Northern District of California held, in Perry v Schwarzenegger, that Proposition 8 (wiki) was incompatible with the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Louisiana Walker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:25 pm
The case is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:19 am
Dan Levine at LegalPad reports (March 16) that Chief Judge Vaughn Walker stood up and walked out on Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Stephen Bomse in mid-sentence as Bomse continued an argument opposing a discovery motion in the Proposition 8 case in California (Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
In Perry et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
In Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Walker of San Francisco striking down the marriage ban under the federal Constitution. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:28 pm
Walker In Planning and Conservation League v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
Chambers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Walker, Northern District of California:'Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:20 pm
Walker nullifying the measure. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Sergeant Walker gave the laptops to Sheriff's Detective Ruby Stallings.State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the only civil review grant from last week’s conference, the California Supreme Court agreed to review the Third District’s decision in Larkin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am
Chaker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
I recently blogged another successful arbitration request for Lime (Walker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
It seems possible that the Circuit Court will now ask both sides in the federal case of Perry v. [read post]
