Search for: "WALKER v. JACOBS"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
No this isn't IPKatSee Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) and in particular the glorious write up here.Food gets a 0% VAT rate. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Katy invited me, on my next visit home, to accompany her to the site of the Thomas Maule – Zillah Walker home. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:51 pm
Walker in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Perry v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
Today, following some years of litigation which the IPKat has monitored here, here and here, the UK Supreme Court has given its decision in Schütz v Werit [2013] UKSC 16, A unanimous five-judge court (Lord Neuberger, Lord Walker -- both of whom are former members of the Patents Court -- plus Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) allowing the appeal and holding that Werit was not infringing Schütz's patent rights by supplying replacing parts. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:10 am
NLRB v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Other coverage and commentary continue to focus on Monday’s oral arguments in Walker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:22 am
"After reviewing a Department of Labor policy guideline from 1967 and a Supreme Court ruling from 1947, the Second Circuit (Walker, Jacobs and Wesley) formulates the standard, but not before noting the position advanced by each side:The plaintiffs urge us to adopt a test whereby interns will be considered employees whenever the employer receives an immediate advantage from the interns’ work. ... [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:23 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Walker and Jacobs) says it does not.Rule 11 has been in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for decades, but it had no real bite until sometime in the 1980s, which courts began sanctioning lawyers more frequently after the rule was revised. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:50 am
Employers or landlords might, for example, discriminate against prospective employees or tenants who have arrest records without distinguishing those merely arrested from those arrested and subsequently convicted.The Court of Appeals (Wesley, Walker and Jacobs) rejects plaintiff's creative argument. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Professors Kent Barnett & Christopher Walker argue in their piece, based on the amici curiae brief they filed, that the Court should not overrule Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Jacobs covers the second argument yesterday: Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:46 pm
Human Genome Sciences v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
App. 2001); Walker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses “law and symbolism” at the Court and argues that the “majority got it right” with its ruling last week in Walker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
The case for that proposition is Rentas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
In Walker v. [read post]
