Search for: "WALLACE v. UNITED STATES" Results 301 - 320 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Elizabeth A. Wilson
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:28 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“As part of the nation’s health care system, Medicare serves vulnerable populations,” said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am by Jay McDaniel
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:54 am by Michael Lowe
Judge Sid Harle and the Court of Inquiry Ken Anderson didn’t throw the first punch here; his brief with its exhibits is filed in response to a report presented to the Honorable Sid Harle, a district court judge out of San Antonio who was appointed by Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson to preside over The State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:20 am by Sheppard Mullin
The very day after the Ninth Circuit issued Sullivan, Judge Josephine Tucker of the United States District Court for the Central District of California applied the Sullivan decisions to grant partial summary judgment to defendant Countrywide Home Loans in Wallace v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Coming back to Propecia, the warning label in the United States didn’t mention until June of this year, but the warning labels in the United Kingdom have said for some time: In addition, the following have been reported in postmarketing use: persistence of erectile dysfunction after discontinuation of treatment with PROPECIA; male breast cancer (see 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use) Propecia in Sweden and Italy has similar warnings. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:16 am by Steve Vladeck
Appearing as an amicus in support of Arizona, the United States offered a similar set of arguments. [read post]