Search for: "WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST v. Public Service" Results 21 - 40 of 1,981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2007, 7:12 pm
The Washington Post recently had an article about this interesting piece of software. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the fact that IACUC meetings are open to the public also diminishes the public interest in transparency. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:45 am
About the Interest Group The International Economic Law Interest Group promotes academic interest, discussion, research and publication on subjects broadly related to the transnational movement and regulation of goods, services, persons and capital. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
The Government had argued that Section 1346 should criminalize schemes involving fiduciaries’ undisclosed conflicts of interest, defined as “the taking of official action by [a public official or private] employee that furthers his own undisclosed financial interests while purporting to act in the interests of those to whom he owes a financial duty. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm by Katie Bart
A group of students from the Washington area who showed up in November to see argument in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
Alan Morrison is the Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest & Public Service Law at George Washington Law School. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Morrison, who is the Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest & Public Service at the George Washington University Law School, has published The Impacts of McIntyre on Minimum Contacts in Arguendo, the online version of the George Washington Law Review. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Simply stated, what motivates much public interest regulation is a simple desire by some here in Washington to tell the American people what’s best for them. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:58 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Indeed, imposing this requirement would largely eliminate the ability of a private plaintiff to pursue such relief, because class certification requires “the existence of both an ascertainable class and a well-defined community of interest among the class members” (Washington Mutual Bank v. [read post]