Search for: "WASHINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 1 - 20
of 867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 9:18 am
Washington Department of Corrections, the Department of Corrections (DOC) designated a "limited number of female-only correctional positions—specifically, 110 positions to patrol housing units, prison grounds, and work sites. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:18 pm
By Cynthia McNabb and Kim Lowe In Aponte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:24 am
Briefs: Appellants Opening BriefRespondent Cooke Aquaculture Pacific BriefRespondent Washington Department Fish & Wildlife Corrected Response BriefAppellants Reply BriefAmicus – Jamestown S’klallam TribeAmicus Washington State Department of EcologyAmicus – Swinomish Indian Tribal CommunityAppellants’ Answer to AmicusAppellants Answer to Amicus Washington State Department of EcologyWDFW’s Answer to… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:35 am
Administrative law — Petition for judicial review — Filing fees In November 2018, David Bready, appellant, petitioned for judicial review in the Circuit Court for Washington County, challenging a decision of the Inmate Grievance Office. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:33 pm
Department of Corrections, __Wn.2d __, __P.3d__ (May 13, 2010, Case No. 80998-4), a plurality of the Washington Supreme Court ruled that a prison inmate was a necessary party to a public records injunction lawsuit filed against the Department of Corrections by corrections officers whose records had been requested by the inmate. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
§ 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional rights by Department of Corrections (DoC) and Seattle Police Department officials in implementing Washington's sex offender registration and community custody programs. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:53 pm
But is this interpretation of the law really correct? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
A Washington State Court of Appeals recently held that an inmate’s public records lawsuit against the State of Washington Department of Corrections (“DOC”) was time-barred, and therefore properly dismissed. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Long v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Policy Implications Previously, I discussed how the court’s ruling in Humane Society v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:20 am
In Florer v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:05 am
LEXIS 41960 (WD WA, May 4, 2009), a Washington federal magistrate judge granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to allege that that the 2004, 2006 and 2008 kosher and mainline dietary menus offered by the Washington Department of Corrections were nutritionally and religiously inadequate. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:30 am
” Anfinson v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
Olsen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 am
Terms of “last chance” agreement in lieu of termination included a valid waiver of the right to arbitrate or litigate his subsequent terminationMatter of James Schmitt v New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 47 A.D.3d 1098, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 10 N.Y.3d 709James Schmitt, a correction officer at the Washington Correctional Facility in Washington County, served disciplinary charges alleging “excessive… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON – The Department of Justice, the Department of the Army and the Department of the Interior issued the following statement regarding Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:16 pm
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, __ Wn.App. __, 2011 WL 4357760 (September 20, 2011). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:10 am
Washington, (6th Cir., Oct. 12, 2021), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals held that Michigan Department of Corrections universal religious meal plan is inadequate to meet the religious needs of Jewish prisoners. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
