Search for: "WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
District Court held than an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority could, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act [29 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad Introduction National Museum in Sweden, National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, National Gallery in London, Louvre… climate protestors have been increasingly frequenting art museums. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
To accommodate consumer demand, airports across the country have built infrastructure for car rental firms, including dedicated facilities, airport transit, and parking areas. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Area Transit Auth., 2020 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
King, 19-546, and King v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 9:18 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Statement to police On October 17, 2017, Joshua Duarte, on behalf of his employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), inspected an abandoned home owned by his employer. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lobbyists who have a smaller salary and work in specialist areas or for public interest groups are less overconfident, or even underestimate their success. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Philadelphia Inquirer – Michael Brice-Saddler (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2019 The 44 names that U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:42 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., Aug. 17, 2018), the D.C. [read post]
