Search for: "WATER POWER v. Human Rights"
Results 41 - 60
of 610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, a federal district judge in Oregon issued a remarkable decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
The preamble to the Bill also acknowledged that s. 33 was only being invoked given the pressing public nature of the dispute, as well as the legal ambiguities that were currently at stake due to the appeal underway, Whereas Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights an (sic) Freedoms, exists for the purpose of permitting publicly accountable legislators to finally determine essential economic and social policy; and Whereas the present state of the law is unclear as to the meaning of… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
An environmental human rights case brought against the United States has been declared admissible by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).Toxic contaminants spewed by fourteen industrial facilities in and around Mossville, Louisiana, have been polluting the air, water and land there for years. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
(Völkerrechtsblog, Symposium, Framing Human Rights? [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
(Völkerrechtsblog, Symposium, Framing Human Rights? [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
The claims of human rights abuses were asserted under the ATS. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:22 am
(This post is part two of a two-part series on the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the Hirsi v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
Human Rights Council. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
The Queen’s Speech and human rights The Queen’s Speech included various announcements of potential interest to law and religion specialists, the most important of which was probably the proposed new Bill of Rights that will reform the Human Rights Act 2010. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:29 am
Additionally, this right includes "the right to a system of government that protects and secures . . . human, civil, and collective rights," but the nature of those human, civil, and collective rights is anybody's guess. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
BUAV v Information Commissioner and Newcastle University (EA/2010/0064) – read judgment There is no doubt that freedom of expression plays a starring role in the human rights fairy tale. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
The other, more significant, event was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in Austin v UK. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court had just decided Kelo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:52 am
In Nyirenda v Ministry of Health, the applicants sought to review the of the imposition of mandatory vaccination, arguing that it amounted to a violation of human rights including the right of bodily integrity, as part of the right to private life and the right to free and informed consent. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
On 25 July 2019, the European Court of Human Rights delivered an important judgment in Brzeziński v. [read post]
