Search for: "WEBSTER et al" Results 41 - 60 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Harford, Webster’s Patent Cases 295 (1841) Pennock v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:00 pm
[denoted QWII]The August 06 article also noted: the errors in the approach of Quillen et al. are apparent on the face of the papers. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm by Nicholas Pengelley
Rosetta Books, LLC et al., when Random House sought an injunction preventing Rosetta Books from publishing in e-book format, arguing that its copyright to publish in “book form” was an exclusive license that permitted publication in any and all formats. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:17 am
Quillen, Jr. et al., Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:45 am by James Young
  Instead of providing a mere counter point to the above authors, Budd et. al, I have also included at least one other author who is skeptical about the first group but will say different things than I will. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am by Ben
 The case is TLA Corporation, et al. vs. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:06 pm by Rick Hasen
Mark Ritchie, in his A12-1258        official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, et al, Respondents (A12-1149), and Mary Kiffmeyer, et al., Petitioners (A12-1258), vs. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:56 pm
Board of Trustees of the Florida Gulf Coast University et al. , Middle Dist. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:38 pm
Dan Harrold, et al , an 11-page opinion, Judge Friedlander writes:Upon interlocutory appeal, Fairbanks Hospital (Fairbanks) appeals the trial court's determination that a claim filed against it by Dan, Eva, and Natalie Harrold (collectively, the Harrolds) does not fall within the scope of the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act. [read post]