Search for: "WEBSTER v. STATE" Results 201 - 220 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 9 March 2015 the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Annissa Webster v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
A crash occurred in Polk County on November 24, 2010VEH 1 WAS NORTHBOUND ON HWY 17, VEH 2 WAS SOUTHBOUND ON HWY 17LOST CONTROL DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS, ENTERED NORTHBOUND LANESCOLLIDING HEAD ON WITH V ... [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 8:39 am
Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12, 859 P2d 1143 (1993), as recently modified by State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm by Unknown
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; 638 Contract) United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:54 am
Mr Justice Burton concluded his judgment by stating that the choice by an insured of his own lawyer did not "of itself constitute the taking of an unreasonable step".___________________________________ 1(1) Christine Brown-Quinn (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) Motorplus Ltd: Webster Dixton LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) ACM ULR Ltd: (1) Janine Baxter (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1)… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:58 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
This past week, the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States District Court in the case of Sun Life Assurance Co. v. [read post]