’“In the words of the Court of Appeals:"Our conclusion that appellants must submit medical evidence contesting the City's physician's findings in order to trigger a hearing is also supported by the holdings, in other contexts, that due process does not require a hearing on a claimed invasion of a property or liberty interest in governmental employment, until the employee has raised a genuine dispute on operative facts (see, Codd v Velger, 429 US 624, 627; Matter… [read post]

(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]

Henn, 68 So. 3d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“trial court erred by excluding the medical bills showing the full amount of the charges”); Taylor v. [read post]

(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]