Search for: "WHITE v. CORRECTIONS et al" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 09771-19 Reynolds v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 09940-21 Louise Hough v dailypost.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2019), 5 Reporting suicide (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09942-21 Louise Hough v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2019), 5 Reporting suicide (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after… [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am by Guangjian Tu
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am by Jonathan Holbrook
LaFave, et al, “Judicial Involvement in Negotiations,” 5 Crim. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Circuit Offers Bad News, Good New on Net Neutrality: FCC Repeal Upheld, But States Can Fill the Gap (EFF) Mozilla v FCC EFF Amicus Brief (EFF) California's Net Neutrality Law: What Happened, What's Next (EFF)  CA’s Net Neutrality Law Letters of Supporters (EFF) Broad Coalition Urges Court Not to Block California's Net Neutrality Law (EFF) California Net Neutrality Cases - American Cable Association, et al v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
  But a Christianity co-opted by political and economic powers, white supremacists, or homophobia is not mine,[6] and it is not presented here. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]