Search for: "WHITE v. HALL et al" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 12:34 pm by Jon Sands
In this dissent from an en banc to reconsider a white-collar sentencing, Gould et al accuse their brethren from ignoring too lenient sentences in a reasonable review, especially when it comes to white collar crimes. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 37 from 2011: GT 2460 B57 2011 Birth rites and rights / edited by Fatemeh Ebtehaj … [et al.]. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am by John Mikhail
The current deadline for the President to respond to the second amended complaint in CREW et al., v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
”8 These tactics were largely effective: because of the lawsuits, the New York Times pulled its Alabama reporter for several years, sharply limiting its original reporting on events there.9 Both NYT v Sullivan and Abernathy et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]