Search for: "WHITE v. STARBUCK" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
The IP Adjudicator found that where the application mark is filed in black and white, colour is not a factor which influences the mark-similarity assessment.As for the layouts of the marks, Starbucks argued that the marks are similar by virtue of the following features and the arrangement thereof:i) a concentric circles layout; (ii) a pictorial device in the innermost circle; (iii) the brand name in curved lettering at the top of the concentric circle; (iv) a descriptive phrase in… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Perhaps the objectives of Dumb Starbucks and Starbucks do not seem “sharply different” in this context (Blanch v Koons).Could Dumb Starbucks have pursued their marketing objective without copying as much of the Starbucks branding? [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:15 am by Jay S. Becker
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently affirmed the dismissal of a claim of retaliation under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act1 (CEPA), finding that the plaintiff did not engage in any protected activity when she reported violations of law to her supervisor and managers as part of her job responsibilities. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:45 am
You go to Starbucks and order a coffee. [read post]