Search for: "WHITE v. STATE ex rel."
Results 61 - 80
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
Although even the CJEU must allow for some differences in Member State domestic laws, it is in principle able to be more pre [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 4:31 pm
In Thomas ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:33 am
Mar. 31, 2021); see also United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm
Fla. 2009), aff’d sub nom., Hendrix ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 9:52 am
Care Alternatives, 952 F.3d 89, 97 (3d Cir. 2020), and United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:03 am
Lamberth ruled in the case of United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
That means that Sacklers would be able to avoid their civil liability to the states and individual opioid creditors for a relatively low cost and without having to have gone through bankruptcy themselves. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm
["In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either" South Bay or Jacobson] Earlier today, Eugene blogged about Kentucky ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am
From Kentucky ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
See Nuxoll ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:35 pm
"); State ex rel. [read post]
