Search for: "WHITE v. STATE ex rel." Results 121 - 140 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, 785 F.3d 1207 (8th Cir. 2015) — 785_f.3d_1207 United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
 Petition for Writ of CertiorariBrief in OppositionReply Brief  11-420Virginia, ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Relying on “white primary” cases in which states had delegated election administration responsibility to private associations that discriminated against black voters, Justice Kennedy’s opinion observed that just as government cannot escape from constitutional constraints by farming out the task of picking voters, neither can it free itself from constitutional norms by giving private parties the power to pick jurors.This “juror as voter” theme in… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm by Orin Kerr
See In re Caulk, 125 N.H. 226, 232, 480 A. 2d 93, 97 (1984); State ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:17 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]