Search for: "WIFE v. v. HUSBAND V." Results 1 - 20 of 6,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2008, 1:27 am
Regina v L (Evidence of wife) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “There was no requirement to tell a wife that she was not a compellable witness against her husband before interviewing her about a crime of which her husband was suspected. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
The husband did not attend the hearing of the wife's application, but was represented by leading counsel and junior counsel.The court was therefore in the position of having to deal with the wife's application with no evidence from the husband as to his financial position.The wife's counsel submitted to the court that under the principles in Hadkinson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0562, 2011 MT 189, JAMES HUGHES and RHEA HUGHES, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0240, 2011 MT 270, LOREN and MARY HINEBAUCH, husband and wife, and GOOD THINGS, LLC, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:40 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0133, 2010 MT 254, STEVE WHITE and DONNA WHITE, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:21 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0469, 2016 MT 136, JACK and BONNIE MARTINELLI, husband and wife; THOMAS and HAZEL MCDOWALL, husband and wife; THOMAS SHAFFREY; and BARRETT and KARI KAISER, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARBON COUNTY, the governing body of the County of Carbon, acting by and through JOHN GREWELL, JOHN PRINKKI, and DOUG TUCKER; DOUG and DENISE AISENBREY,… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:30 pm
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if you are going to claim that you are a refugee due to your sexual orientation, come up with clear convincing evidence.This was not the case in SZMNV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, where the wife claimed refugee status because she was a lesbian and would therefore be persecuted in India, and the husband claimed refugee status because:of [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
R v Kousar [2008]; [2009] WLR (D) 16 “A wife who shared the matrimonial home with her husband, whom she knew was storing merchandise from his business at home, but acquiesced in it being there and did not demand he remove it, was not in control or possession of the goods within the meaning of s [...] [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:18 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0299, 2009 MT 410, CRAIG McKAY and LISA McKAY, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:59 am
WALTON, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:33 am by sally
Vaughan v Vaughan [2010] EWCA Civ 349; [2010] WLR (D) 95 “When a judge was determining (i) a husband’s application to terminate a financial obligation to his former wife and (ii) the former wife’s application to capitalise the obligation, and he was comparing the financial needs of the former wife and a present wife, there remained a presumption that on marriage each spouse took the other subject to all existing encumbrances,… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0746, 2012 MT 125, NIGEL and JAMI DAVIS, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]