Search for: "WILLIAMS v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION" Results 161 - 180 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A Private Duty in Pandemics, and Insurance Considerations In Adam, Abudu v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
A step behind: (Spicy IP),Proposals for ISPs to terminate infringers go (even more) global: (LawFont.com),Five ways to minimize risk of copyright liability from citizen media: (IP ADR Blog), Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralMillennium Pharmaceuticals spent $1.28 million on lobbying for patent reform and biologics legislation in 2007: (Patent Docs),New Thai Minister may review compulsory licences on cancer drugs: (Intellectual Property… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
Davis: The Court reversed the trial court’s order denying him credit for time served while serving part of a Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA) sentence. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
Rev Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA179 Pheffer (MS) -- Imposes criminal responsibility on juvenile offenders for felony murders resulting from the attempt to commit juvenile offenses No Same as BLURB : CP L. juv offndr: felon murder Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to codesA182 Christensen -- Enacts Erin's law No Same as BLURB : Pen L. enacts Erin's law Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to codesA236 Greene -- Establishes a drug treatment alternative… [read post]
Further, William Kovacic—a former FTC chair, commissioner, and general counsel—explains that the unanimous Supreme Court opinion in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
The court addressed the problem of so-called "deliberate two-step" strategies employed by law enforcement to obtain a self-implicating statement from a suspect before a Miranda warning, and then using that statement to obtain a confession post-Miranda in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Williams, in which the panel ruled that a sentence had to be vacated because the defendant had not been physically present at the sentencing proceeding. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
The Administration, which didn't want to be perceived as raising taxes justified the individual mandate as an exercise of the Commerce Clause, a la the famous New Deal case of Wickerd v Filburn. [read post]