Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
First, the majority stated that the Williamson County holding was not consistent with precedent or workable for litigants, as illuminated by San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:55 am
For an example of the strange procedures Williamson County has spawned, see West Linn Corporate Park, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am by Wally Zimolong
For nearly 36 years, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), this Court held that state court judgments in actions filed pursuant to Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:38 am by John Day
Oral arguments were heard two months ago in Williamson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:42 pm by Robert Thomas (
  Sorry for the impossibly nerdy detour, but that's what the Solicitor General's argument in Knick v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:09 pm by Robert Thomas (
The court concluded that Williamson County's "state procedures" requirement compelled Wayside to seek compensation from the County in Michigan state courts before running into federal court. [read post]