Search for: "WINKLER v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
In other words, the party being examined is not able to reflect upon requests unless counsel states on the record that the request will be taken under advisement or an objection is raised. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
In other words, the party being examined is not able to reflect upon requests unless counsel states on the record that the request will be taken under advisement or an objection is raised. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
University of Texas at Austin continues with Roger Clegg’s response to a post by David Gans and Adam Winkler. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
I’ll note at the outset that of course this broadly remedial rationale for the legality of its discrimination is not being urged by the University of Texas (making it unlikely that the Court could invoke it), that adopting it would also require the Court to toss aside a lot of case law (including, as discussed below, Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
University of Texas comes from David Gans and Adam Winkler. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
On Monday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amici curiae brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:05 am
Although the Boy Scouts receive sponsorship from several government entities, the BSA itself is not a religious group, as ruled by a federal court of appeals in Winkler v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced it will hear the appeal in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced it will hear the appeal in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
John Roberts is sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice of the United States under President George W. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 6:43 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
Winkler v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Jackler and Bowie v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:20 pm
King, No. 07-15763 (May 18, 2009) (successful) and United States v. [read post]
