Search for: "WORD TO INFO, INC. v. FACEBOOK INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As Eric notes on his post on that case, “[defendants’] spam failed to comply with CAN-SPAM in several respects, including forged headers, fake email addresses and bogus contact info. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Please consider writing your MP a letter of displeasure. cc: @stoonchamber -> Wissa v Associated Newspapers, Remember to plead the words complained of! [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
 In other words, a Rule 12(b)(6) motion does not argue that a lawsuit is defective because there is some deficiency or other problem with the facts in the case. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Microsoft and Nintendo joystick controllers (transforming analog signals to 8-bit digital words that describe position) found not to infringe Fenner's patent (transforming analog signal into digital pulse, the width of which describes joystick position). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
This means that unlike publishers, site owners are not legally liable for the words of third parties who use their services. [read post]
And then COVID-19 came to the States, schools began to shut down, offices began to close, and even our children began to learn what the word “Zoom” meant. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Impersonation on Facebook, Twitter, etc. [read post]