Search for: "WORTH JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Herring" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm by Chuck Cosson
This, as noted above, is a basis for her hypothesis that the principles, endeavors, and systems of science are (or were, at the time of her writing) androcentric or, put differently, “masculine. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm by Joe Mullin
BarTex is owned by Florida attorney James "Beau" Parker, who also asserts Harris patents through other holding companies, such as Innovative Patented Technologies and Illinois Computer Research. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
See, Scott James Preston, Whistleblowing in Intercollegate Athletics, University Business, March 28, 2012, (discussing Glenn Hedden v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
It concerns Kerik's lobbying activities for Interstate, a construction company with reputed mob-ties and millions in city contracts that employed both Kerik's brother and Larry Ray, his good friend and best man at his wedding. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:35 am by Steve Kalar
  a word is known by the company it keeps,” is one of the many handy principles of construction explained in the Court’s deconstruction of Section 402. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
 Hardly seems worth it, even at 99% profit, since profit is something Mr. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The majority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that wasn’t enough to void the whole prenuptial agreement, and Justice Eakin dissented: A groom must expect matrimonial pandemonium when his spouse finds he’s given her a cubic zirconium instead of a diamond in her engagement band, the one he said was worth twenty-one grand. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
He reported owning a stake worth at least $60 million when he entered government in 2017. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, 135 S.Ct. 1318 (2015). [read post]