Search for: "WORTH V. DEPT. OF REVENUE"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
” (Herbert H Post & Co. v Sidney Bitterman, Inc., 219 AD2d 214, 224 [1st Dept 1996], quoting Franklin v Winard, 199 AD2d 220, 221 [1st Dept 1993]). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services, another constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Somerville,.5 AD3d 878 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 1:29 pm
of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:40 pm
Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 530 U.S. 15 (2000) and Travelers Cas. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:26 am
Vanderbilt Credit Corp v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
[James C.], 17 NY3d at 9; Nicholson v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
If a ruling in an obscure tax case yesterday is any indication, the threshold for unacceptable chaos is surprisingly low.In Dept. of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Revenue Dept Eastern District of Kentucky at FrankfortBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Iowa Dept. of Revenue, Dkt. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
This is evident in the court’s rulings in the cases of Gair v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
Montana Dept. of Revenue The biggest religious case of the term involves whether states can be forced to use taxpayer funds to support religious schools. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am
The new decision, CIP GP 2018 v Koplewicz, 194 AD3d 639 [1st Dept 2021], addresses a subject we’ve addressed on this blog many times: enforceability under New York law of oral partnership or joint venture agreements. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Attorney Witness Properly Disqualified Based upon Advocate Witness Rule In Jozefik v Jozefik, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433996 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:31 pm
--Fort Worth 2004, pet. denied). [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
P’s burden: show revenues. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
” The Appellate Division affirmed in all respects in Quattro Parent LLC v Rakib, 181 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2020]. [read post]
