Search for: "Wade v. Sellers" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2014, 9:43 am by John Elwood
The brief, which was filed by Wachtell’s George Conway of Morrison v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
Consequently, any encumbrances on the seller's title need to be specifically listed and excluded from the warranty or the seller will be in breach of the warranty. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Redbubble and others]….just because a seller is an online service does not mean they automatically escape liability…. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:56 pm
The Court said that, the Wade motion should likewise have been granted and the indictment dismissed. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
This suggestion was first expressed as a risk-benefit test by Vanderbilt University Law School Dean John Wade in his 1973 article On the Nature of Strict Tort Liability for Products.6 Wade argued for nullification of strict liability for all types of product defects—both manufacturing and design—and a return to negligence principles. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Hillel Y. Levin
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overruling Roe v. [read post]