Search for: "Wagers v. Wagers"
Results 1 - 20
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
Oklahoma v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:02 pm
Christie, Governor of New Jersey, et al, Petitioners v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
With its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
In Kramer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
The court of appeals’ opinion in State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:31 pm
This connection prompts a reinterpretation of Plessy v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
In Scott v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
In Offutt v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
Despite almost half the states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court overturned the federal ban in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
In Shuman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
The IRS, relying on Offutt v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:11 am
Racing and Wagering Board, ___N.Y.3d___(Dec. 17, 2008): Given the... [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
Dutrow v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., 2012 NY Slip Op 05699, Appellate Division, Third Department One of the issues in this appeal challenging a disciplinary action taken against an individual by the New York State Racing &... [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:20 am
The post Football face off for charity: Lions v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:26 pm
American General Life Ins. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
Oregon and Delaware at the time offered only parley wagers. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:13 am
A factual demonstration to support allegations that an individual was denied a fair hearing by an administrative tribunal is critical to rebutting the presumption of honesty and integrity accorded to administrative bodies Dutrow v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., 2012 NY Slip Op 05699, Appellate Division, Third Department One of the issues in this appeal challenging a disciplinary action taken against an individual by the New York State Racing & Wagering… [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:59 pm
Thongthepsomphou v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:21 pm
Humphrey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:51 am
Sadly, this was precisely the situation in a case decided last October, Kafataris v Davis [2016] FCAFC 134. [read post]
