Search for: "Waggoner v. Waggoner" Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject that contention inasmuch as the statute of limitations was tolled by the doctrine of continuous representation during the time that the same attorney represented plaintiffs in the underlying action (see [*2]Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7, affd ___ NY3d ___ [May 11, 2010]; HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, 63 AD3d 534, 535)"   [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject that contention inasmuch as the statute of limitations was tolled by the doctrine of continuous representation during the time that the same attorney represented plaintiffs in the underlying action (see [*2]Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7, affd ___ NY3d ___ [May 11, 2010]; HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, 63 AD3d 534, 535)"   [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at Law360 (subscription required), Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court [in Lamone v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The record presents an issue of fact as to whether defendant continuously represented plaintiff in connection with a personal injury claim based on the accident, such as to toll the statute of limitations during that time (see Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 94 [1982]; Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Religion News Service, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]