Search for: "Wagner v. Chambers"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
From Linthicum v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Building on Adam Wagner’s earlier posts, I also offer a possible explanation as to why the panel of the Grand Chamber refused a rehearing of the Greens case. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:42 am
Adam Wagner writes: CASE OF SCOPPOLA v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Wagner v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
In the news As the UK government is requesting the referral of Greens and M.T. v UK to the Grand Chamber, with the intention that the European Court of Human Rights reconsiders the issue of prisoner voting, the Committee of Ministers, vested with the responsibility to oversee the enforcement of the Court’s judgments, has put on hold its ongoing review of the UK’s compliance with the decision in Hirst v UK (No. 2). [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:11 am
" It's written by John Wagner and Henri Cauvin. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:18 am
President Thomas V. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
In his speech earlier this week the Attorney General announced that he would appear in person before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in two weeks’ time, when it hears Scoppola v Italy No2, a case concerning prisoner voting. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
But as a courtesy to O'Malley, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:20 pm
Natasha Holcroft-Emmess is a trainee barrister at Matrix Chambers. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:10 pm
In Wagner v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:50 am
This is an expanded version of a comment made on Adam Wagner’s post: Should more trials be held in secret? [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
In the news: Although prisoner voting appears to have taken a back seat this week, the Daily Mail has reported that the UK government has asked the European Court of Human Rights to refer the decision of Greens and MT v UK to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
As the UK awaits the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision in Khawaja and Tahery v UK, both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have held that hearsay evidence was compatible with article 6. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
Article 9 breached – see this case note from Garden Court North chambers Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616 (25 May 2011): Sultan of Pahang not entitled to diplomatic immunity as Pahang is sultanate of Malaysia, not a state for purpose of immigration rules. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
