Search for: "Wagner v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Wagner, 43 S.W.3d 128, 132 (Ark. 2001) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).Connecticut:  Boone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
- Pittsburgh lawyer David Wagner of Reed Smith on the firm's Environmental Law Resource Estate of Jorgensen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
His opinion has been the target of criticism (see ObiterJ’s post, Roger Smith’s piece for the Law Gazette and Joshua Rozenberg’s article for the Guardian). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Smith & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Crim 1772 (19 July 2011): Court of Appeal: Blanket internet bans for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders always disproportionate; court gives general guidance. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
In the courts Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch)  - Housing trust worker was wrongfully dismissed after he posted privately on Facebook that gay marriage would be an “equality too far” [case comments here and here]. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
Smith, 420 Mich. 1, 20, 360 N.W.2d 841 (Michigan Supreme Court 1984) (opining that as used in the two constitutional provisions, “ ‘possessions' and ‘effects' are virtually identical in meaning” and therefore there exists no reason to treat those provisions differently).People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
“The analysis is a balancing act,” wrote Rothstein in a 6-1 ruling in Tervita Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 2:32 am
Smith     Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0468n.06 USA v. [read post]