Search for: "Wagner v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, 88 AD2d 547, 548 [1st Dept 1982]; see Matter of Jacob D. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
Wagner and Walters came to complain about the newly added scienter requirements. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
Wood is a Wisconsin criminal & DUI defense lawyer & shareholder at Van Wagner & Wood, S.C. in Madison, Wisconsin. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:40 am
Wood is a Wisconsin criminal & DUI defense lawyer & shareholder at Van Wagner & Wood, S.C. in Madison, Wisconsin. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Negassi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) (04 March 2011): Asylum seeker not entitled to damages for being prevented from working even though UK failed to properly implement EU Directive (see our post on last year’s supreme court decision on asylum seekers’ right to work). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Walker, 234 N.W. 144, 147 (Mich. 1931); Wagner Electric Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
All dialogue is actual and taken from the transcript on the Broward Blog in State v. [read post]