Search for: "Wahl v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
This clearly does not apply to the appellant's submissions which contain issues on which the impugned decision was not based within the meaning of Article 12(2) RPBA 2020.The recourse to Article 15(8) RPBA 2020 requires that the Board agrees with the findings and reasoning of the decision under appeal in respect of one or more issues.The Board concludes from this precondition of concurrence with (parts of) the decision under appeal as well as from the legislator's intention (see… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued its decision in the matter of Coty Germany v Parfümerie Akzente. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
| the special world of pesticide products, counterfeits and parallel imports | New CJEU reference ... asking whether InfoSoc Directive envisages digital exhaustion | Freedom of panorama in Italy: does it exist? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
As always, IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary - the 159th edition of Never Too Late.Keeping one eye open for the latest IP newsCross-undertaking in damages - Napp Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz LimitedHow does one calculate the damages caused by an interim injunction? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
| the special world of pesticide products, counterfeits and parallel imports | New CJEU reference ... asking whether InfoSoc Directive envisages digital exhaustion | Freedom of panorama in Italy: does it exist? [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:44 am
” CommentThe Opinion of AG Wahl appears both correct and sensible, including from an IP perspective [but see herefor a critical take]. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:43 am
Further, Wahl does not identify how the risk of unfair prejudice would outweigh this probative value. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:31 am
Further, Wahl does not identify how the risk of unfair prejudice would outweigh this probative value. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
’AG Wahl advised the CJEU to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék as follows:(1) [Answering questions 1 and 2, correctly in this Kat's view] For the purposes of Article 4(3) ... [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
  And choice of law can be a big issue – like in two recent MDL cases:  Wahl v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
  * Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]