Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes"
Results 121 - 140
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:51 am
Bouaphakeo, a case that will provide the Supreme Court with the opportunity to clarify the extent to which Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Riley Whereas Wal-Mart scored a major victory for employers in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
” As Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
” Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
June 8, 2015), a case that raises important issues on how class and collective actions are certified and adjudicated—and may allow the Court to provide further guidance on questions it addressed in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
On appeal, Tyson contended that certification was improper because employees’ individual routines varied and, thus, the litigation could not generate common answers apt to drive the resolution of the litigation as required under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am
Finding that the district court fundamentally misapprehended the reach of Wal-MartStores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:12 am
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:59 am
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
