Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Street" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is mobilizing its store managers and department supervisors around the country to warn that if Democrats win power in November, they’ll likely change federal law to make it easier for workers to unionize companies — including Wal-Mart. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ann Lipton
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (.pdf), detailing its reasons for its earlier holding that Trinity Wall Street’s shareholder proposal addressing gun sales was excludable from Wal-Mart’s proxy statement.... [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:33 am by Ann Lipton
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - I got an email notification that the Division... [read post]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [1] The Court had issued an earlier order, without an opinion, that Wal-Mart could exclude Trinity’s Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposal relating to the sale of firearms with high-capacity magazines from Wal-Mart’s proxy materials because it related to “ordinary business operations. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed certification of a Rule 23(b)(2) class encompassing all women currently employed by Wal-Mart in a variety of different positions with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief and back pay but remanded as to certification of the claims for punitive damages and the claims of putative class members who no longer worked at… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Dukes: Reshaping Class Certification – LIVE IN DENVER     Program Description:   When it issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:47 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Among other things, we will analyze the Supreme Court’s treatment of statistical evidence in the recent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:45 am by David Melancon
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., that indicated that a party does not have a duty to eliminate all variations in elevations along streets, sidewalks and parking lots. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 11:45 am by David Melancon
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., that indicated that a party does not have a duty to eliminate all variations in elevations along streets, sidewalks and parking lots. [read post]