Search for: "Walden v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
  In the third decision yesterday, Walden v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm by Oyez Project
United States Steel Corporation Walden v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
”  The Court also heard oral argument yesterday in Walden v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by William Baude
  Next week, on November 4, in the Court will return again to both topics during oral arguments in Walden v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-820. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
The Court granted certiorari in one case, Walden v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:20 am by SHG
  But I have no plans on handing unfettered discretion to the government to decide if and when to slam a defendant, because someone in the United States Attorneys office has decided that he's the one who deserves it.What makes posts like Walden's insidious is that many will applaud his take, that he argues against the application of mandatory minimums to non-kingpins. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by New Books Script
KF 240 B425 2010 The law workbook / Scott Beattie ; Milgram’s 37 and other experiments by Tonia Walden. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
Walden O’Dell, Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-00909 (D.D.C.); and SEC v. [read post]