Search for: "Wales v. Howard"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 8:43 am
Howard & Hallam Limited (Respondents) Seal (FC) (Appellant) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
In particular the Court (applying Associated Newspapers Ltd v HRH Prince of Wales [2002] Ch.57) impressed the importance of establishing not just that there is a public interest in publication; but also that there is a public interest in breaching the confidence which attaches to the information. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
The Court of Appeal in England & Wales has handed down its judgment in the matter of Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648, on appeal from the decision of Sir David Eady, sitting as a judge of the High Court on the Queen’s Bench Division Media and Communications List. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
In Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2017] EWHC 3368 (QB), the High Court considered two complex issues: one relating to the doctrine of forum non conveniens and the other to the CPR provisions on service of a claim form. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
In Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Limited and others, [2017] EWHC 644 (QB) Popplewell J granted an application for an interim non-disclosure order preventing the publication or use by a news agency of information contained in documents supplied by Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP (“BHAM”) to 36 potential professional investors. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:07 pm
Friedman:In Ladele v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:13 am
In Elzahed v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
Reuters had also argued that publication of the information would be in the public interest – but it was clear from Associated Newspapers Limited v HRH Prince of Wales ([2002] Ch. 57) that it was not enough simply to it establish that there was a public interest in publication – there also had to be a public interest in breaching the confidence which attached to it. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
The Kats are all grateful to Katfriend and occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing) for teasing out the relevant facts and explaining them so succinctly here:Factual Background SDL Hair Ltd v Next Row Ltd & others [2014] EWHC 2084 is the inquiry as to damages judgment of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, that followed the decision of 14 June 2013 on liability by Mr Recorder Richard Meade QC [noted on PatLit here]. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:21 am
Belghar (New South Wales Ct. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
[With thanks to Howard Friedman.] [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
In the England & Wales High Court's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:17 am
Assange was appealing against the decision of Senior District Judge Howard Riddle in the City of Westminster Magistrates Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
Howard Platnick likely misrepresented the views of specialists so it was easier for an insurance company to deny a victim benefits after the accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
[With thanks to Howard Friedman.] [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm
The Associate Justice referred (at [33]) to Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363, [28], where Giles JA of the New South Wales Court of Appeal held as follows: ‘In determining whether due notice has been given regard will be had to the notice provisions of the foreign court: for example, notification not by personal service but in accordance with the rules of the foreign court may be held to be consistent with affording natural justice even if not in accord with… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am
One of his judgments which garnered media attention and criticism from the (then) Home Secretary – Michael Howard- was the case of R v Home Secretary ex p Norney [1995] QBD 6 Oct. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
In McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 308 the New South Wales Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against the refusal of an application to file a fourth further amended statement of claim In Con Ange v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] NSWSC 1200 the New South Wales Supreme Court made an order for the plaintiff to be cross-examined on his affidavit verifying his discovery list. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
In the case of Polias v Ryall & Ors, the New South Wales Supreme Court awarded a poker player AUS$340,000 when he sued four of his former friends for defamation following comments posted on Facebook about a trip to Las Vegas. [read post]
