Search for: "Walk v. State Compensation Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, my remarks this morning are in my official capacity as Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the staff. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:57 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The Labor Commissioner alleges the defendants unlawfully made prohibited deductions from the drivers’ pay, failed to pay them minimum wage and overtime compensation, did not provide sick time, and failed to provide workers’ compensation coverage or make unemployment or disability benefit contributions to the State. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Labor is alienable; that is, employees can walk out the door, and they can do so before firm-sponsored training has paid adequate dividends. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
Wagner began questioning the panel of witnesses by citing a recent speech by SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw while asking whether it is easier or more difficult for businesses to raise money. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 8:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the investigators’ report stated that they were unable to substantiate T.M. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm by Patrick E. Knie
An appellate panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission upheld the single commissioner’s ruling that the professor was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm by Patrick E. Knie
An appellate panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission upheld the single commissioner’s ruling that the professor was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]