Search for: "Walker v. Brown"
Results 181 - 200
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
Supreme Court judgment (i) Construction of Schedule 1 A five-justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown Mance and Wilson unanimously dismissed the appeal, despite adopting slightly different positions on the correct construction of the Schedule 1 provision. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
The bench throughout is Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Dyson and Sumption. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:36 pm
EPA and Mayo v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:41 am
Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., 350 F. 2d 445, 449-450 (1965) and Steven v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:20 pm
Read Brown-Nagin in conjunction with Anders Walker's The Ghost of Jim Crow: How Southern Moderates Used Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:42 am
In this case, called Brown v. 1301 K Street Limited Partnership, the employee was hired by Allied Barton Security beginning in January 2005. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
The issues in the case, Perry v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor continues this week in the Supreme Court from Monday until Wednesday, and is being heard by a panel of seven (L Hope, L Walker, L Dyson, L Brown, L Clarke, L Sumption and L Reed). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
The majority of the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance) opted for a purposive interpretation of Part IV, Schedule 1 of the Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States, 11-8023; Walker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Cook v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Tuesday 21 February will see the beginning of a six day hearing for Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of the Inland Revenue& anr in front of a seven judge panel ( L Hope, L Walker, L Brown, L Clarke, L Dyson, L Sumption, L Reed). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance dismissed it on the basis that even if information was held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it remained outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Lord Mance dismiss the appeal on the basis that, even if information is held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it is outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:24 am
Walker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
From Wednesday 15 February 2012 over two days is the appeal of Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council, on appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) which is being heard by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Reed and Dyson. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
Brown. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
Brown. [read post]
