Search for: "Walker v. City & County of S. F." Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Henrichsen, Henrichsen Law Group, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Victoria Blanche Kroell, Cole Scott & Kissane, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
I follow Lord Walker’s reluctance to see an Administrative Court judge having to hear oral evidence in a forum unsuited to it. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:08 pm
 In contrast to the discretionary extension (paragraph 2 above), this benefit is self implementing, and is not dependent upon city or county consent. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:08 pm
 In contrast to the discretionary extension (paragraph 2 above), this benefit is self implementing, and is not dependent upon city or county consent. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
Cal. 2007) 2007 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 22573 are long, detailed, and consumed 110 pages of Judge Walker’s 167 page opinion. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
Cal. 2007) 2007 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 22573 are long, detailed, and consumed 110 pages of Judge Walker’s 167 page opinion. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Walker All in all, 2011 reflected a significant year in terms of the sheer number of published appellate decisions. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. [read post]