Search for: "Walker v. City of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am
On my way to writing a post applying the UK Supreme Court’s decision on the Boris Johnson prorogation to the City of Toronto decision upholding the province’s reduction of wards, I decided to take a detour to examine the College of Midwives of British Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
There are older Supreme Court of Canada decisions, in Walker v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm
There are older Supreme Court of Canada decisions, in Walker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:45 am
" City of San Antonio v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:45 am
" City of San Antonio v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Louisiana Walker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:41 am
Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, in her dissent, said the majority opinion contravenes the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 6:19 pm
Given the collateral bar rule (illustrated by Walker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Columbia County Includes the cities of Appling, Grovetown and Harlem. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
And third, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that a proposed referendum on same-sex marriage was prohibited under the city’s human-rights law (Christian Science Monitor story; Washington Times story).In the policy realm, the American Bar Association (ABA) is considering taking a public position in favor of same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:44 pm
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company in the context of a statutory transformation of consumer protection law. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Thus, punitive damages may be awarded where the [*6]wrong complained of is "actuated by evil and reprehensible motives" (Walker, 10 NY2d at 404), is "intentional and deliberate, and has the character of outrage frequently associated with crime" (Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479 [1993], quoting Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 2, at 9 [5th ed 1984] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
See Walker v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm
If you want to see a literally correct - but nonetheless patently problematic- application of the SCC's first example, look at the ABCA decision in Bowes v Edmonton (City) 2007 ABCA 347. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Virginia and Turner v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Contractors v. [read post]
