Search for: "Walker v. Collins" Results 81 - 100 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
  In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:46 am
  The panel consisted of Lords Hope, Saville, Walker, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:04 pm by James Hamilton
The individual was simply not part of the corporate governance structure of the composite companies, said the Court, and did not assume a role in those companies which imposed on him the fiduciary duties of a director.Holland v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
   It will be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Kerr and Clarke. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
  by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Listening to the well-rehearsed arguments will be Lords Walker and Collins and Lady Hale.Anti Copying in Design -- better known as ACID -- has just released its latest newsletter. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued August 4, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rice v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Rodger (with whom Lords Walker and Collins and Sir John Dyson SCJ expressly agreed), at para [82] and Lord Hope, at para [35], provided detailed guidance in respect of the test to be applied by the lower tribunals and courts in determining claims for asylum protection based on sexual orientation. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Walker expressed “disquiet” and said that “It is not the function of this Court to deliver advisory opinions…” Lord Collins agreed that “There is an obvious danger in giving what are in substance advisory opinions on hypothetical facts divorced from any concrete factual situation… That is particularly so in the present case. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Ettinger; Toschi, Sidran, Collins & Doyle, Steve Toschi and Sumair S. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Brown (2007)), and allowed state supreme courts that had promised to review death sentencing patterns to stop doing so (Walker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
And what carnival would be complete without clowns, stilt walkers, jugglers, balloon sculptors, magicians, hot dogs and ice cream? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am by Matt Bodie
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]