Search for: "Walker v. District of Columbia"
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Second, it could seek preclearance from the Department of Justice concurrently with a declaratory judgment action in the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to entertain a challenge to a determination by the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Berle Professor of Law Columbia Law School James D. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
Iowa is among the six states, plus the District of Columbia, where same-sex marriage is now legal. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
” Flast v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:15 am
” [Walker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 9:25 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
Walker overturned Proposition 8 in Perry v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Clover Gifts, Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N D California: Though geographically descriptive, claim mark was suggestive not groundless: Sand Hill Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:52 am
Board of Education and District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy previews Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
