Search for: "Walker v. Phillips"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
Ms Phillips, in turn, relied on the “exception” to PSI in section 72. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
Ms Phillips, in turn, relied on the “exception” to PSI in section 72. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Starting today in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, listed to be heard by Lords Walker, Clarke, Sumption, Reed, and Carnwath. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Blaine, Phillip E. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
Supreme Court judgment (i) Construction of Schedule 1 A five-justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown Mance and Wilson unanimously dismissed the appeal, despite adopting slightly different positions on the correct construction of the Schedule 1 provision. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
The extra hearing is scheduled in order to hear representations on a number of important issues of principle in relation to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, which were not fully explored at the original hearing, and will be heard by a panel of nine (Lady Hale, Lords Phillips, Walker, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Wilson and Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
McCarthy v Phillips Elec. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
The majority of the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance) opted for a purposive interpretation of Part IV, Schedule 1 of the Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Four linked cases will also be starting on 21 February in Court Room 2 in front of L Phillips, L Hale, L Mance, L Kerr, and L Wilson. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance dismissed it on the basis that even if information was held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it remained outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Lord Mance dismiss the appeal on the basis that, even if information is held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it is outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Starting on Tuesday 7 February 2012 is the two day hearing in front of a panel of seven (Lady Kerr and Lords Phillips, Walker, Kerr, Brown, Dyson and Wilson) of R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
” from Lord Walker at [32]). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
A bench of Lords Phillips, Walker, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson is to determine whether the appellant’s certificates of deposit are recoverable from the respondent bank, which is in liquidation. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption and concerns the respondent chartering a vessel from the appellant owners and missing the hire payment, resulting in the vessel being withdrawn whilst laden with cargo. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
