Search for: "Walker v. White"
Results 121 - 140
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
See Walker v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am
They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
, and the case that won the lottery to replace Walker v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Attorney Alice Walker, in July 2007, not as a favor to Scruggs but to protect the Rigsby sisters and the State Farm documents they took. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod dissented to say that she would have followed the 6th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Douglas Berman of the Sentencing Law Blog and Sarah Miley of Jurist note yesterday’s cert. grant in Walker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:44 am
Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 (1968) and King v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Castro v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am
Where’s the walkers? [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
Scott Walker of Wisconsin. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Board of Education, Anders Walker, St. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
Private equity: Rich white guys winning under our tax rules that they helped write. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Mohamed v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
In a very fact-intensive petition, Clark argues that the Mississippi Supreme Court failed to compare the prosecution’s rationales for striking Black jurors based on their answers to the similar responses of white potential jurors. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
WalkerOn January 29, 2008, Judge Thomas Cahraman of the Riverside Superior Court ruled that CEQA did not require the Banning City Council to consider the Global Warming impacts of a project approved prior to the enactment of AB 32.In Highland Springs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:35 am
The case is Hamilton v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
This case generated extensive news coverage in Connecticut, including a good summary of the oral argument in January 2012.The case is Jones v. [read post]
