Search for: "Walters v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Social Security Administration, for example, applies a place-of-residence rule when determining whether an individual can apply for benefits based a spouse’s earning records. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm by Alex Potcovaru
The Director of the Office of Government Ethics, Walter M. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
Government agencies, such as the Social Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Health and Human Services will all be operating in an environment of legal ambiguity. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
” (p.16, quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The Local had a piece “Drones and surveillance cameras: France’s new security bill explained”. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
The discretion shield aims to “prevent judicial ‘second-guessing’ of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
The discretion shield aims to “prevent judicial ‘second-guessing’ of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
" In William Curtis, Gary Stewart and Walter Raines v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
Walter Dellinger, thoroughly address those reasons. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To the contrary, President Trump has made transforming the Supreme Court and overturning Roe a central goal of his administration. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This provision has created chaos: Couples who were legally married in their home states were nevertheless treated as single by the federal government for purposes ranging from immigration, to taxes, to Social Security Accordingly, Section Three has been repeatedly challenged in court. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
Connelly, Jr.Connelly, William F., 1951-Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4749 .K365 2010To secure the liberty of the people : James Madison's Bill of Rights and the Supreme Court's interpretation / Eric T. [read post]