Search for: "Ward v. Federal Insurance Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Insurance Co., 165 Ariz. 31, 796 P.2d 463, 468. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
As explained in in Montgomery Ward & Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Therefore, federal contractors faced with disparate impact claims under EO 11246 may choose to avail themselves of the defense contained in the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The critical point is that the FDCA gives exclusive enforcement authority to the federal government. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:16 pm
SP Technologies v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
But years later, Marshall made his thoughts clear about the treaty clause in an 1823 decision called American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
After a long argument about grammar, the Court will decide whether a mandatory minimum ten-year sentence enhancement for a child-pornography conviction triggered by a prior state law conviction for sexual abuse applies even when the prior conviction did not “involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 22, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
This is consistent with several court of appeals decisions issued shortly before Dukes, in particular the Seventh Circuit’s decision in American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Yelaun, No. 07-1651 Conviction and sentence for federal fraud related offenses committed during a scheme to collect insurance payments for medical tests is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) certain trial testimony was admitted in error; 2) there was a variance between the indictment's count 43, which charged defendant with conspiracy to commit money laundering, and the proof at trial; and 3) the judged erred in calculating defendant's sentence according to two… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music… [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 (1950)); Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
Blum, 73 AD2d 237, 241-242 [2d Dept 1980], Medicaid is a "co-operative Federal-State program operated under State direction, but subject to Federal statutory and regulatory guidelines. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
