Search for: "Ward v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
It's Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), an 8 June Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Iain Purvis QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court on an appeal from the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06  Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  This was the fifth libel case of 2015 – so far the claimants have won two and the defendants have won three (for the others see our post on Starr v Ward). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
” Specifically, it was stipulated among parties that Smith’s websites would express and communicate ideas, primarily those that “celebrate and promote the couple’s wedding and unique love story” and those that “celebrat[e] and promot[e]” what Smith understands to be marriage. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]