Search for: "Ward v. U.s.*"
Results 81 - 100
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 7:49 am
Robinson in Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:17 am
Among other things, the Complaint seeks a judgment that would “[a]ward Plaintiff compensatory damages according to proof at trial but in an amount not less than $100,000.00”. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
In a classic case of statutory interpretation, in which every technical thrust seemed to be met by an equally adept technical parry, Lockhart v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
… Tenny v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
California v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court in Gall v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
Marty v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Judging from this morning’s oral argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
Next Tuesday’s argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The district court did not consider the Supreme Court's opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Hurst v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
After a long argument about grammar, the Court will decide whether a mandatory minimum ten-year sentence enhancement for a child-pornography conviction triggered by a prior state law conviction for sexual abuse applies even when the prior conviction did not “involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
” Lockhart’s petition asks “whether § 2252(b)(2)’s mandatory minimum sentence is triggered by a prior conviction … that did not ‘involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:56 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm
The Federal Circuit recently addressed the interaction of the California Business and Professions Code and federal food and drug law in a case called Allergan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
Bullock v. [read post]
