Search for: "Warden v. Warden" Results 1 - 20 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Derek Warden (Louisiana Supreme Court) has posted The Disability Rights Anticanon on SSRN. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Maryland Public Information Act — Request for recordings — Non-existence of recordings In December 2013, Dontae Spivey, appellant, an inmate at the Jessup Correctional Institution (“JCI”), requested that John Wolfe, appellee, the warden of JCI, provide recordings of phone calls he made to his attorney – Rachel Kamins – on certain dates because he believed ... [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:25 am
R (Warden and Fellows of Winchester College and another) v Hampshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 431; [2008] WLR (D) 132 “The formal requirements governing the making of an application to modify a definitive map and statement under s 53(5) of, and para 3 of Sch 14 to, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, which were contained in para 1 of Sch 14, had to be adhered to strictly. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:39 am
Regina (Warden and Fellows of Winchester College and Another) v Hampshire County Council Court of Appeal “Statutory requirements governing the making of an application to change the status of a right of way were to be adhered to strictly. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:22 pm by rtruman
Cali Supremes: Game Wardens Don’t Violate Constitution By Stopping Hunters, Fishermen :: People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am
Conspicuously absent from that typical pantheon of error is perhaps the worst of all, second only to Dred Scott—Buck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am by Christine Corcos
Conspicuously absent from that typical pantheon of error is perhaps the worst of all, second only to Dred Scott—Buck v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:06 pm
MIKE MAHONEY, Warden, and STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents and Appellees. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the inmate’s suit under Section 1983 should not have been dismissed on qualified immunity grounds (Keith v. [read post]