Search for: "Ware v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
 “Like many others, we believe this agreement has the potential to open up access to millions of books that are currently hard to find in the U.S. today,” Hilary Ware, Google’s managing counsel, stated. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
United States President Biden has signed an Executive Order implementing an EU-US data privacy framework for transferring data. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am by Jarod Bona
But the program could very well violate antitrust and competition laws in the United States, the European Commission, or other jurisdictions. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  Terri Moore came up with the idea of the Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Ron Coleman
 I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:03 am by Amy Howe
It emphasizes that Congress envisioned the FHA as having “unique and enormous breadth,” as evidenced by the fact that its stated purpose was to provide for “fair housing throughout the United States. [read post]