Search for: "Warner Chappell Music, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 9:11 am
May 13, 2024 | By: David Trinnes The Supreme Court recently ruled 6-3 in the case of Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:08 pm
Warner/Chappell Music Inc. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
By Dennis Crouch and Timothy Knight On May 9, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
But Warner/Chappell hasn't given up either .... the music publisher is seeking Judge King's reconsideration of his September ruling, in particular, they disagree with King's interpretation of a 1940s agreement between Summy and the Hill sisters, and, as an alternative, has requested permission to file an immediate appeal. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm
The song allegedly generates at least $2 million a year in licensing fees for Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
District Judge found that Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. did not hold a valid copyright on the song "Happy Birthday To You‚¬, and the song was held to be in the public domain. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:44 pm
The law firm for the plaintiff is Wolf Haldenstein, which was involved in the recent successful challenge to Warner/Chappell Music’s claims that it owned the copyright to “Happy Birthday to You. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., No. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:58 am
However, currently Warner Chappel Music currently licenses the songs for commercial purposes to the tune of $2 million per year. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:51 am
“Good Morning to You Productions Corp”. seeks to declare invalid the copyright claim of Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. for “Happy Birthday to You” and reclaim the world’s most popular song for the public. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:21 am
The court rules 6-3 in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
In White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., and the American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers (ASCAP) paid the royalties to Anthony Sepe, who in turn gave half to his brother. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:26 am
Accordingly, Warner/Chappell has been demanding and collecting fees to license something it doesn’t own. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Vindication, I might add, for my colleague Bob Brauneis at GW Law School, who wrote a definitive debunking of the “Happy Birthday” copyright claims several years ago, but bad news for Warner/Chappell Music Inc., which reportedly has been collecting more than $2 million a year in royalties (!) [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:48 am
Copyrights in all the Compositions were and are owned by Mijac Music and administered by Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:37 pm
But now comes word via Techdirt that a class action suit has been filed by Good Morning to You, Inc. against Warner/Chappell Music, the entity that has been asserting copyright ownership over HBTY (and collecting those royalties). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
” Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:24 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Class Action Suit Aims To Strip Warner Of ‘Happy Birthday’ Copyright First off today, Emma Woollacott at Forbes reports that filmmaker Jennifer Nelson has filed a lawsuit against Warner/Chappell, the publishing arm of Warner Music Group, seeking a declaration that the popular song “Happy Birthday to You” is in the public domain and an order that Warner return all license fees… [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 3:00 am
More New Jersey insurance law on Monday. 1Katy Perry (EMI Music Publishing, Warner/Chappell Music, Inc).2372 N.J. [read post]
